Greetings and welcome to my radio listening audience and online readers article. On this 19th day of October 2012, we will of course discuss the future of technology, future innovations and futuristic concepts. Indeed I hope truly Mayan calendar was wrong, or maybe they carved it ran entirely out of stone simply slipped out of rock to chisel on, the world will be saved from what it was the Mayans thought could be new age or renewal.
Okay so, I’d like to delve into the subject of our radio talk show today and I am sure that now you understand format, basically, “I will do the talking for 30 minutes minus advertising Your job is to listen carefully, come up with comments and questions, and then I’ll open up the phone lines to hear what you have to say. “As you also probably I do not respond to online comments are not intellectually based. It does not mean you can not have an opinion, nor does it mean that it has to be the same as mine. In fact, if you too much preaching to the choir, I will simply cut you off, might agree with you, and go to the next caller.
Our job is to have intellectual discussion, debate, discussion and debate. That is why you are here, it is my role, and we will finish it. Now then obviously there is a tremendous amount of talk about innovation, the need for innovators and entrepreneurs in our country to keep us strong, vibrant, and cutting edge technology. You will not get any disagreement in the reality, however, it seems as if the word “innovation” is perhaps one of the most overused words in the English language now, perhaps more than “unsustainable” which by the way, some things may appear to be unsustainable or disastrous problems we believe we face today, but may very well be resolved with the technology of the future
Einstein used to say that. “it takes a brilliant person to solve the problem, but it takes a creative genius to prevent the problem from ever happening in the first place,” and therefore I would say that creative geniuses do not always get credit for solving the problem, but brilliant person will, even if the previous solutions have changed unintended consequences, and they are rehired to fix what they broke for the first time by including fixing something to save us all.
Well then, here’s where I’m going to start throwing out stuff, with little discussion follows each one. They will run the gamut all across the board from a science fiction subject to the latest and greatest technology today and what they might mean for our future. I will also throw out some personal original new ideas that I come up with at least two new original ideas a day, and we can discuss them as well if you want, or maybe you’ll have a different topic for our discussion here. Now then, let’s start with the first material ;.
1) Will Physical Money survive the next three decades – Hackers and Trade Questioned
In reality, money has little or no value – consider dollar bill, it is just a flimsy piece of paper, so how much is it really worth it? We believe that it is worth what it says on the face of it if there is one dollar, five dollars, $ 10, $ 20, $ 50, or even C-note. Money only works because people have faith in the value of, and what it can buy. Most of the money is made these days never exist in physical form, it is only in the digital world. For example, you might get paid from the Corporation, that money could digitally transferred into your bank account. You may then use the ATM to buy something, or pay bills online, but you never had the money in a hot little hands. Things have changed a lot over the last three decades have not they?
So what will happen in another three decades, I ask? Will we still have physical money, or it will all be digital, and you will always have all the money in your wallet to buy something? There are some futurists believe that the money will go out the window, that is physical money, and everything will be digital in the future. But what if our society and culture does not trust digital money? What if they are concerned that our banks are being hacked? Recently in 2012 we have observed that our banks have come under cyber-attacks from Iran at least Leon Panetta believes that’s where the attack originated, but who is to say in the future if we have a war with another nation on Cyber -attacks Our monetary system must not have?
After all, economic warfare is becoming quite common, why just consider sanctions, trade war, and our efforts to stop the money flow from terrorists, drug dealers, money launderers and human traffickers along with central computer systems rogue nations and transfer their money for things like oil, natural resources, and military armament?
Then what’s the point now where more and more people are making mobile payments mobile Personal Tech their devices. Today they are buying a cup of coffee, hamburger, or a variety of items in stores. In the future it could be much more, or if it will be unreliable or the personal technology devices are hackers, perhaps through download applications from malware, or from users surfing websites with malware, then people will not trust mobile payments. Some have suggested that some personal technology devices can actually come with pre-loaded back-door or software that could be used by hackers to steal data or commit identity theft crimes.
may arise in which people do not T wishing to buy something online, or do online banking because they do not trust the system, they do not want their money to disappear one day into some of some foreign country. Having someone drain your bank account only needs to happen once, and only needs to happen to a close friend or family member before everyone they know will be sketchy. In case you do not want to use digital money, and that the case more people will prefer to use physical money, because it is quite possible that physical money will be simply as a safety factor in the decades to come.
But how safe is the physical money going to be if a disaster or wildfire that burned home, or earthquake? What about the hurricane with a huge tidal wave, tsunami, or major river banks jump? Is your money safe physical, how much safer it is digital money in this case? Speaking of disasters and floods, perhaps we can better predict the future? Let’s talk about that for a moment with the next topic in our
2) We need a real test for the 100-year flood Mathematical Calculations – A Thought
How can we produce better mathematical calculations for. flood zone, or proverbial hundred year flood? What can we do to better optimize these mathematical models so that they are quite right? Lots of work has been done in the past based on height, and flood mapping. But there’s more to it than that, there are all sorts of other things to consider with erosion patterns. Let me give you an idea here?
We dates, temperature, rain fall and run-off right, we know the history, as well as the measured territory before and after right? Thus, all very good mathematical simulation erosion should look the same as real if you input how the landscape was once a temporary condition to what it is now. See point
It is very interesting YouTube video I would view this content, successful side issue, agricultural top soil erosion. “Dave Montgomery – Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations,” Now then, let me express my thoughts on this that, all these theories and speculation make a lot of sense with unlimited examples in the current period of reduced scales – rational, visible, and thus makes it sense, so then, Razor Occam lives.
So, my speculation of a lecture by Dave Montgomery and theory would be the same. Indeed, this was a great lecture, solid evidence and research. Well then, now we can now put forward these results to help scale mathematical models and simulations of soil erosion. Let me ask another question, or perhaps the same question differently.;?
3) we can use mathematics Fractal Simulation for Fool human When View erosion Patterns
If so, it would be like the Turing Test? And if so, can I call it virtual reality Winslow test, called me to consider it? If you are a pilot as I am, and you fly over the territory, you’ll see various patterns of how the mountains and the erosion had occurred over the past few thousand to 10,000 years ago. You can see the floodplains, mountains, canyons, and it all makes sense – you can see exactly how the water flows, or had slipped in the past. What if we used a computer to design the erosion patterns that never happened, and what if we asked people, perhaps a pilot who has seen and flown over the territory of so many times in the past if it was real or not?
Are our computer models good enough to fool the human eye? I’m talking about the training of observers who have seen this in the past again and again? Is it possible; I think it is. And so, how do you know when you look at Google Earth if you are looking at your performance, or fake Birdseye view that perhaps closer to a military base, or secret areas? The fact is that you’re not, or you? How about those who work for the national satellite intelligence agencies, where all they do is study the terrain map? Could they catch the difference?
Before you answer, the question of why do not you use Google Earth satellite views and fly across the desert in Nevada. Some of the material looks very strange with weird colors, but it’s all true. If you doubt that it is real, go ahead and fly over southern Bolivia in Google Earth and see some of the landscape of salt flats of the area and up against the mountains, you get the same interesting colors, much of it seems to be real either, but it is. Some of the features that NASA has looked on Mars do not look real, but they are.
No, they are not the same as warming the erosion patterns that we see now could have been created by wind, there is a different atmosphere, or lack of. Do you see my point? Not long ago, I was watching online video lecture on erosion patterns, Stephen Wolfram is a new type of science, and Mathematica – fractals and mathematical simulation programs and erosion patterns. They are incredibly predictable, and that in itself is interesting. It is as if you can see in the geological record through the ages.
You may want to see some of that yourself. And speaking of free lectures, university lectures on just about any topic you want, I wonder if it will change the future of higher education in, why go to school and pay $ 100,000 to Get an Advanced great when you can learn almost as much online through self? Yes, interesting, this means that it is the death of University, or are we entering a new age of information flow in education? Let’s go ahead and talk about the lecture type learning
4) Want to learn while watching Online Video Lecture – .. Go Full Screen and Cutting Distraction
First, if you are in university lecture hall, listening to the best and brightest professor on a particular subject there is a good chance you may fall asleep, but still attention span will be longer because you are there, and there are not the same disorder and watching online video. If you are looking at the university home video on your computer in a box on the screen – there’s lots of distractions
For example, what else is in the room, maybe doorbell, TV, or information. the phone rang. You might feel the need to text someone back, go to the refrigerator to get something to eat, or just drop out – listen while you’re doing something else, assuming that you can multitask and learn something complicated at the same time. It’s not that you can not, it is you probably will not and memory retention level will be next to nothing, and you have wasted everyone’s time and some bandwidth to boot. Still, let me ask another question,
5) Lecture Dead – even if it’s all online and free in the future
This is a good question, even if you disagree.? it. On October 20, 2012, article in the tech news. Harvard had set up two free online courses in computer science. They were clearly follow the lead of Stanford computer science department, as they did the same thing last year. Harvard had the same results over 100,000 people signed up, people from all over the world. There is no shortage of people who want to learn online, but to do this; they are cutting their own throats as they disseminate information to the rest of the world at no cost, or they increase their credibility by doing it? It could lead to more people who want to join the school in the future, the greater age.
Apart things are changing rapidly, even if the basic lecture at our university has not changed much since the 1800s. Indeed, I suggest that you look at the YouTube video; “Do not lecture me” (with Twitter song) – Donald Clark ALT-C 2010, “because these gentlemen makes a lot of sense Perhaps also of interest is another YouTube video called ;.” Re-inventing Lecture (Or, Why Online Lectures do not work, and what we can do with it). “
Actually, I think after you watch the videos you will be better able to comment on what I’m talking about here, and it’s something that needs to be discussed. We need a national discussion of this, that is if we want power technology and innovation and entrepreneurship in which we move our great nation forward into the future. Next, I would like to discuss;. ??
6) A large university, High tuition fees and large buildings and beautiful architecture – we are learning more
Why is it that we put so much faith in the larger universities in our It’s interesting is not it? They spend huge amounts of money put up great architecture and large buildings, but is that really what makes them great? Even if someone has a great building, it does not mean they know what they are talking about, consider some of the largest churches in the world, for example, or the largest mosques. Is it high to University fee; it means they great? Having been in business all my life, I can remember a number of attorneys in fact raise their prices just so they could get more business because people thought that they pay more for an hour they must to be good, they were not.
Indeed, if a large university spends all his money on landscaping, beautiful brick work, great statues outside the lecture halls, and the one with the image of divine architecture – then have less money to teach you. They have less money to hire the best professors, buy the best equipment or provide the best future for their students. That’s not to say they can not, they might charge you money far exceeds the amount of education and you just have to pay for all that extra stuff. If you can get a lecture online for free on YouTube – in many regards information is basically the same
Maybe in the future living room gaming virtual reality technology will project holographic professor of 3-D upbringing. Professor at you, and it can be done for a fraction of the cost, there is no building to pay for, perhaps building, and professor, and anything can be predicted on the living room and you’ll feel as if you are they are. Therefore, you get the same experience and interaction, even break up into groups with a virtual-reality avatars fellow students. Who needs college anymore? Better yet, the need to take out $ 100,000 in student loans at the same detailed information, minus a large building?
Still in the living room gaming center that doubles as a new training headquarters phone and the latest real or Augmented Reality 3-D holographic computer game immersion tools – you could actually train artificial intelligent supercomputer network to think like humans. This information could be used by future robotic systems for all kinds of things from self-driving trucks, cars and planes through a virtual-reality simulator instructors for future combat vehicles in the battle space. Speaking of that, I have another question for you,
7) we Crowd Source Satellite Data for Future Military convoys
Well, if we did, we would not need to say.? someone who was watching on satellite data when or where we could be moving troops, equipment or resources, we could just say that this is one of the possible ways sometime in the future, and if you find abnormalities mark it down. Those who find the most deviation receive a check in the mail, or a gift certificate to your favorite retail stores at the end of their two months. They will not know when, where or variations they found was one that gave them a free gift card.
Those who feel more real deficit of false positives would be given more point spread for the dollar of errors they found. Further, they could receive an extra hundred dollars in the mail every month because they had higher credibility rating. If we did this in the end algorithms watch the best human minds find these anomalies could figure out how they are doing it, and it’s catching their eye, and that we may better design artificially intelligent satellite detection process algorithm that would incorporate how the human mind thinks and how the computer thinks that will give us the best of all worlds by putting these two together.
Maybe in a way, they are already training supercomputers artificial intelligence algorithms to run all our society and civilization to the future. After all, every time you put something on the Internet, the Internet could learn more about how humans think, work, and go about their business. About many things we could create arrays for our own future, and this artificial intelligence system will be known, and they will be leaders in the future, it will not be a person? It can, and let me ask you another question,
7) What happens when the cloud computing Centers filled with all Human Information Become aware
Consider if you will like someone said recently. ? The Futurist Magazine in October the September issue of 2012 along this line of thought, something along the way; “We already have an algorithm that can search all the information in any of these cloud computing centers,” and “We have all kinds of algorithms to help us find the data and algorithms that talking to other algorithms.” Sure, all that makes sense, and also believe that the human brain :.
A) We have various brain waves and they interact with each other.
B.) There are various materials that provide energy mix.
C.) We have sensors all over the body, and the five senses to gather information and experience, taking in all our observations.
If a cloud computing center, which will be talking to each other and talk to him to include all the written and visual record of mankind, they have already collected all the experience, writing, observation, use, and history and so it is just one small step from becoming aware. This is the future that we’re moving toward, my question is; Do we dare?
In a way, cloud computer would know, it would be very similar to the brain where every individual neuron, the individual human. That is, every piece of the puzzle, from top to bottom had intelligence. Is this a new form of intelligence? Well, let me scale it down to a simple board game and ask you another question,
8) Can we design a 3-D Chess Board Game Where Every piece has AI and seek to live [19459003?]
And if we could design something like that, would not be very similar to all network centric warfare concept? Is not that how real military works? Each soldier gets a job, but each soldier care, it follows its orders, but also attempts to do what is in the best interest of her, which is to live, to fight and to win. In war, it’s pretty serious, you either win or you die. Can we design a 3-D chessboard to do the same? How much better it would be if it were to give feedback back to AI Chess Master?
We have already found that artificial intelligence working with human Chess Master can beat artificial intelligent chess playing machine from IBM. When we combine human intelligence with artificial intelligence that we seem to get a boost. What if every piece on the chessboard had artificial intelligence and understand how men think, adapt, live and work under pressure? We are not to blame when all this the future of AI through our input on the Internet? Sure we are, and if you’ve listened to this radio, or read my articles for any time, you already know the answer.
What if we scale down even further? What if we scaled it all the way down to the molecular level? What if these molecules or nanoparticles could talk to each other? Are we talking about the next generation of microelectronics? Take it all the way down and continue the tradition of Moore’s Law? Have you noted recently in scientific news in October 2012 that carbon nanotubes have extraordinary qualities for producing light and small holograms? Will this be a new way to interact at the micro level?
Bacteria seem to share, and when it gets to scale and reaches a tipping point, it activates itself, trying to subdue by force and number. It operates much like an army, although applied mathematical and reliable, well-nigh? Almost like a chessboard where each individual member is also the best interests of his? Perhaps as we design computer algorithms small or largest scale, we will start to see the same as what we learn will propel us further and faster in the future.
There was an interesting article in Photonics on September 27, 2012 titled; “Nanotubes Project Holograms”, which noted that ,.
“Holograms can be generated by activating a leading light-scattering properties of carbon nanotubes, developments that could lead to crisper plans with larger vision Many scientists believe that carbon nanotubes will be at the heart of future industry and culture and will have the effect of solar cells, cancer treatments and optical imaging. Scientists use these nanotubes the smallest time distribution elements to create a permanent holographic projector. “
Applications for all this is unbelievable and it could revolutionize everything, change all human technology; communications, computers, transport, energy, health care, and you name it, just consider the reality here? Would it be so bold as to suggest that someday;.?
9) Super AI decision making computer could be running human life
Interestingly enough, I have deeply considered the future eRepublic or electronic AI decision-making systems, enterprise software super computer concept. If that were not damaged by human it could work well, programmed kindness – if it is possible and if the developers are on the same page of liberty, freedom and the standardization of some aspects and infrastructure needs. Anarchist might not like it, crony capitalists would try to exploit it, the Socialists would want to control it, a religious fanatic would want to destroy it, and so on – again men, while living in such a system designed for freedom and liberty “I think it was a good idea” Paraphrasing Gandhi of the Western Society
What I’m saying or asking Rater is. we could always get groups of people to accept to live with this, even if we could prove them mathematically that would be for the best? Are they ready yet? I would remind you that they should be getting ready for it because they are now training AI supercomputer decision-making machines to do just that in the future, as they are putting all their knowledge on the Internet. You see my point?
Of course, if we do this we have to get it right the first time, but you always know which technologies have come into the world perfect for the first time? Look how many aircraft design crashed and burned for the Wright Brothers actually got one to fly? And even with them it was not like they were not adding insult to injury, as they also crashed several times himself and had broken and folded wing spars to prove it. Speaking of that, I like to talk to you a little bit about how innovation is to be, and stuff ,.
10) Innovation, trial and error, and Original Thinking
Not long ago I was discussing this with my acquaintances from across the pond and he suggested; “Most innovations could be just a program trial and error.” Is he right? Yes, the good part is really so, that’s true enough. Actually it is not so; those who know may have learned it through adversity, failure, find themselves in a place where they refuse to quit in the next round, eventually leads to success due to the strength of character.
Thus, those who have achieved have proved that they have the right stuff, and have worked to solve real problems, but you can not resolve the real problems by practicing “the definition of insanity” which is usually how men “following the leader” usually there, they hire the professionals that got them in hot water in the first place (refer back to quote Einstein), to learn from their successes, not their failures as before
Due this, if anyone is irrational and only provides professional, they really need for a think tank or in the future innovation? No, we should enlist experts themselves, not their hook, line and sinker followers – of course, as I have discussed in previous exhibitions and articles we’d be better off by those who question authority, rather than leaving it all up to post Quo intellectual elite
Now then, with this line of discussion my acquaintances also noted that. “Most mind dazzling discoveries are still connected to several masterminds.” Well, this is quite true, and why we study the names of dead white men, winners of history who wrote in, and talk about the “shoulders of giants”, although many of these incredible advances may have come from affiliates or combine information.
considered stable person for a member of the Royal Geological Society back in the day, he came up with the idea, but he could not read or write, so the man who wrote it got down and took credit for it, and today we have to “memorize” the name of his school, yet in fact it is not how it happened actually.